Evaluating and Ranking Metaverse Platforms Using Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy VIKOR MCDM: Incorporating Score and Accuracy Functions for Comprehensive Assessment





Trapezoidal Intuitionistic fuzzy number (TrIFN), VIKOR Method, Score function, Accuracy function, Metaverse Platforms


The purpose of this study is to develop a new approach for decision-making for addressing multi-attribute decision-making problems within a trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy environment, while taking into account decision makers' psychological behavior. As a starting point, we propose and apply a distance metric model for trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Then, by incorporating the expected value, score function, and accuracy value, we create a novel approach by comparing it with the results obtained from the VIKOR multi-criteria decision-making technique, allowing us to account for decision makers' risk tolerance. Through correlation analysis, we assess the similarities and deviations in the resulting rankings. Finally, we illustrate the practical utility and feasibility of our proposed approach by evaluating the digital marketing capabilities of a few metaverse platforms using standards set in line with marketing mix criteria.


Download data is not yet available.


Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3

Devi, K. (2011). Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14163–14168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227

Ju, Y., & Wang, A. (2013). Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(5), 3112–3125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020

Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M. K., & Grover, N. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with an application to plant location selection based on a new extended VIKOR method. Information Sciences, 370–371, 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.058

Tavana, M., Di Caprio, D., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2018). An extended stochastic VIKOR model with decision maker’s attitude towards risk. Information Sciences, 432, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.019

Li, X., & Chen, X. (2015). Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operator Based on Choquet Integral and Its Application to Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2015048

Das, S., & Guha, D. (2016). A Centroid-based Ranking Method of Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Its Application to MCDM Problems. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 8(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2016.03.004

Cheng, Q., Wang, C., Sun, D., Chu, H., & Chang, W. (2021). A new reliability allocation method for machine tools using the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07331-9

Samantra, C., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2012). Application of fuzzy based VIKOR approach for multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) a case study in supplier selection: Case study in supplier selection. Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.7494/dmms.2012.6.1.25

Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002

Božanic, D., Tešic, D., & Milic, A. (2020). Multicriteria decision makingmodel with z-numbers based on fucom and mabac model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003019d

Naveed, Q. N., Islam, S., Qureshi, M. R. N. M., Aseere, A. M., Rasheed, M. A. A., & Fatima, S. (2021). Evaluating and Ranking of Critical Success Factors of Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption Using MCDM Approach. IEEE Access, 9, 156880–156893. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129523

Salih, M. M., Al-Qaysi, Z. T., Shuwandy, M. L., Ahmed, M. A., Hasan, K. F., & Muhsen, Y. R. (2022). A new extension of fuzzy decision by opinion score method based on Fermatean fuzzy: A benchmarking COVID-19 machine learning methods. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 43(3), 3549–3559. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-220707

Bobar, Z., Božanić, D., Djurić, K., & Pamučar, D. (2020). Ranking and assessment of the efficiency of social media using the fuzzy AHP-Z number model-fuzzy MABAC. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(3), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.3.2020.3.3

Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., & Božanić, D. (2021). A new logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: Application in logistics. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210214031P

Biswas, S., & Pamucar, D. (2023). A modified EDAS model for comparison of mobile wallet service providers in India. Financial Innovation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00443-5

Mzili, T., Mzili, I., & Riffi, M. E. (2023). Optimizing Production Scheduling With the Rat Swarm Search Algorithm: a Novel Approach To the Flow Shop Problem for Enhanced Decision Making. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(2), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame060123042023m

Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Marinkovi, D. (2022). Weights (LMAW) by a Triangular Fuzzy Number and Its. Application in Multi-Criteria Decision Making https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11030089

Gokasar, I., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Gupta, B. B., Martinez, L., & Castillo, O. (2023). Metaverse integration alternatives of connected autonomous vehicles with self-powered sensors using fuzzy decision making model. Information Sciences, 642(April), 119192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119192

Pamucar, D., & Biswas, S. (2023). A Novel Hybrid Decision Making Framework for Comparing Market Performance of Metaverse Crypto Assets. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120238

Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(October), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016300

Mohammed, Z. K., Zaidan, A. A., Aris, H. B., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Deveci, M., & Delen, D. (2023). Bitcoin network-based anonymity and privacy model for metaverse implementation in Industry 5.0 using linear Diophantine fuzzy sets. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05421-3

Singh, A., & Bhat, S. A. (2021). A novel score and accuracy function for neutrosophic sets and their real-world applications to multi-criteria decision-making process. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 41(April), 168–197. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625705

Akram, M., Muhiuddin, G., & Santos-Garcia, G. (2022). An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 19(7), 7201–7231. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022340

Sebastian, G. (2022). A Study on Metaverse Awareness, Cyber Risks , and Steps for Increased Adoption. September. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSPPC.308785

Akour, I. A., Al-Maroof, R. S., Alfaisal, R., & Salloum, S. A. (2022). A conceptual framework for determining metaverse adoption in higher institutions of gulf area: An empirical study using hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100052

Kraus, S., Kanbach, D. K., Krysta, P. M., Steinhoff, M. M., & Tomini, N. (2022). Facebook and the creation of the metaverse: radical business model innovation or incremental transformation? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 28(9), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2021-0984

Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P. (2021). All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda. 14(8), 1–66. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05352

Rauschnabel, P. A., Babin, B. J., tom Dieck, M. C., Krey, N., & Jung, T. (2022). What is augmented reality marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future. Journal of Business Research, 142(February), 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.084

Choi, H. soo, & Kim, S. heon. (2017). A content service deployment plan for metaverse museum exhibitions—Centering on the combination of beacons and HMDs. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1519–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.017

Di Pietro, R., & Cresci, S. (2021). Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues. Proceedings - 2021 3rd IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications, TPS-ISA 2021, December, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPSISA52974.2021.00032

Shen, B., Tan, W., Guo, J., Zhao, L., & Qin, P. (2021). How to promote user purchase in metaverse? A systematic literature review on consumer behavior research and virtual commerce application design. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(23), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311087

Fitria, T. N., & Simbolon, N. E. (2022). Possibility of metaverse in education: opportunity and threat. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(3), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i3.821

de Regt, A., Plangger, K., & Barnes, S. J. (2021). Virtual reality marketing and customer advocacy: Transforming experiences from story-telling to story-doing. Journal of Business Research, 136, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.004

Yung, R., & Khoo-Lattimore, C. (2019). New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(17), 2056–2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359

Korkeila, H., & Hamari, J. (2020). Avatar capital: The relationships between player orientation and their avatar’s social, symbolic, economic and cultural capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.036

Diego-Mas, J. A., & Alcaide-Marzal, J. (2015). A computer based system to design expressive avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.027

Triberti, S., Durosini, I., Aschieri, F., Villani, D., & Riva, G. (2017). Changing Avatars, Changing Selves? the Influence of Social and Contextual Expectations on Digital Rendition of Identity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(8), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0424

Ren, H., & Luo, L. (2020). A novel distance of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its-based prospect theory algorithm in multi-attribute decision making model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 17(4), 2905–2922. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020163

Roostaee, R., Izadikhah, M., Lotfi, F. H., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2012). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method for supplier selection with vikor method. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijfsa.2012010101

Biswas, S., Pamucar, D., Dawn, S., & Simic, V. (2023). Evaluation based on Relative Utility and Nonlinear Standardization (ERUNS) Method for Comparing Firm Performance in Energy Sector. 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.31181/dma21202419

Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: A state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 237(PC), 121660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121660



How to Cite

Isabels, R., Vinodhini, A. F., & Viswanathan, A. (2023). Evaluating and Ranking Metaverse Platforms Using Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy VIKOR MCDM: Incorporating Score and Accuracy Functions for Comprehensive Assessment. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024858