A homogeneous group decision making for selection of robotic systems using extended TOPSIS under subjective and objective factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0304052022bKeywords:
FMCDM, robotic system selection, homogeneous group decision making, subjective factor measure, objective factor measure.Abstract
Selection of the best robotic system considering subjective and objective factors is very imperative decision making procedure. This paper presents an extended TOPSIS based homogeneous group decision making algorithm for the selection of the best industrial robotic systems under fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (FMCDM) analysis. FPIS, FNIS, positive and negative separation measures, subjective factor measure, and objective factor measure and robot selection index are computed. A case study has been conducted and illustrated for better clarification and verification of proposed algorithm.
Downloads
References
Ali, A., & Rashid, T. (2020). Best–worst method for robot selection. Soft Computing, 25(1), 563-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05169-z
Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B. & Mukherjee, S. K. (2002). Material handling equipment selection under multi criteria decision making (MCDM) environment. Industrial Engineering Journal, 31, 17–25.
Chodha, V., Dubey, R., Kumar, R., Singh, S., & Kaur, S. (2022). Selection of industrial arc welding robot with TOPSIS and Entropy MCDM techniques, Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.487
Chu, T. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2003). A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21, 284-290.
Feng, C. M., & Wang, R. T. (2000). Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 133-142.
Fu, Y., Li, M., Luo, H., & Huang, G. Q. (2019). Industrial robot selection using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 122, 103304.
Klir, G., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic (Vol. 4, pp. 1-12). New Jersey: Prentice hall.
Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kahraman, C., Çevik, S., Ates, N. Y., & Gülbay, M. (2007). Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52(4), 414-433.
Majumdar, A., Sarkar, B., & Majumdar, P. K. (2004). Application of analytic hierarchy process for the selection of cotton fibers. fibers and polymers, 5, 297-302.
Narayanamoorthy, S., Geetha, S., Rakkiyappan, R., & Joo, Y. H. (2019). Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 121(1), 28-37.
Nasrollahi, M., Ramezani, J., & Sadraei, M. (2020). A FBWM-PROMETHEE approach for industrial robot selection. Heliyon, 6, e03859.
Parkan, C., & Wu, M. L. (1999). Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(3), 503-523.
Shih, H. S. (2008). Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 720– 734.
Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2007). Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 53(11), 1762-1772.
Wang, Y. J., Lee, H. S., & Lin, K. (2003). Fuzzy TOPSIS for multi-criteria decision making. International Mathematical Journal, 4, 367–379.
Yalçin, N., & Nuşin, U. N. C. U. (2019). Applying EDAS as an applicable MCDM method for industrial robot selection. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 37(3), 779-796.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Zimmermann, H. J. (1991). Fuzzy set theory – And its application (2nd ed.) Boston: Kluwer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
