Toward Supply Chain 5.0: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Sustainable and Resilience Enterprise

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024955

Keywords:

Intelligence techniques, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, Resilience supply chain, Sustainable supply chain, Multi-criteria decision making, MCDM, Single value neutrosophic sets, Single value triangular neutrosophic sets

Abstract

The enterprises and their supply chain (SC) have undergone significant changes because of the highly complex business environment, dynamism, environmental change, ideas like globalization, and increased rivalry of enterprises in the national and worldwide arena. Additionally, pandemics and crises caused SC disruptions for enterprises. Thus, an enterprise’s SC must constantly be ready to face various obstacles and unpredictable environmental changes. In an era of growing technological advancement, enterprises and their strategies are transforming toward sustainable and resilient SC.  For this reason, this study embraces the notion of utilizing technologies such as Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics (BDA) as branches of intelligence techniques of Industry 4.0 (Ind 4.0) and, thereafter, Industry 5.0 (Ind 5.0). Thus, the study contributes to constructing an appraiser model for appraising the enterprises that employ these technologies and techniques in their SC to be sustainable resilience in another meaning resilience supply chain (ReSSC). This model utilized best worst method (BWM) under the governing of Single-valued triangular neutrosophic sets (SVTNSs) to generate an appraiser model. Whereas SVNSs applied in the comparative analysis as a comparative model with the cooperation of AHP, TOPSIS, and WSM to validate our constructed model. The findings of the appraiser model based on MCDM merging with SVTNSs and the comparative model based on MCDM integrated with SVNSs agreed that the optimal key indicator six is securing of data (KI6); otherwise, Key Indicator three is transparency (KI3). Also, these models agreed to recommend enterprises from optimal to worst as En1> En4> En2> En3. From the results of the two models, En1 is the most sustainable and resilient. Contrary, En 3 is the least.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mohammed, A., Yazdani, M., Oukil, A., & Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. (2021). A hybrid MCDM approach towards resilient sourcing. Sustainability, 13(5), 2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052695

Hsu, C. H., Yu, R. Y., Chang, A. Y., Liu, W. L., & Sun, A. C. (2022). Applying integrated QFD-MCDM approach to strengthen supply chain agility for mitigating sustainable risks. Mathematics, 10(4), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10040552

Marinagi, C., Reklitis, P., Trivellas, P., & Sakas, D. (2023). The Impact of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Key Performance Indicators for a Resilient Supply Chain 4.0. Sustainability, 15(6), 5185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065185

Eslamipoor, R., & Nobari, A. (2023). A reliable and sustainable design of supply chain in healthcare under uncertainty regarding environmental impacts. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 10(2), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2022.335389.146

Hsu, C. H., Chang, A. Y., Zhang, T. Y., Lin, W. D., & Liu, W. L. (2021). Deploying resilience enablers to mitigate risks in sustainable fashion supply chains. Sustainability, 13(5), 2943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052943

Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2021). A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(2), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2020-0127

Eldrandaly, K. A., El Saber, N., Mohamed, M., & Abdel-Basset, M. (2022). Sustainable Manufacturing Evaluation Based on Enterprise Industry 4.0 Technologies. Sustainability, 14(12), 7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127376

Rajesh, R. (2021). Optimal trade-offs in decision-making for sustainability and resilience in manufacturing supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127596

Taşkan, B., & Karatop, B. (2022). Development of the Field of Organizational Performance During the Industry 4.0Period. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering (2783-1337), 11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.22105/riej.2022.324520.1286

Nayeri, S., Sazvar, Z., & Heydari, J. (2023). Towards a responsive supply chain based on the industry 5.0 dimensions: A novel decision-making method. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, 119267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119267

Yadav, G., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., & Batista, L. (2020). A framework to achieve sustainability in manufacturing organisations of developing economies using industry 4.0 technologies’ enablers. Computers in industry, 122, 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103280

Gamal, A., Abd El-Gawad, A. F., & Abouhawwash, M. (2023). Towards a Responsive Resilient Supply Chain based on Industry 5.0: A Case Study in Healthcare Systems. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 2, 8-24. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.7

Acioli, C., Scavarda, A., & Reis, A. (2021). Applying Industry 4.0 technologies in the COVID–19 sustainable chains. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(5), 988-1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0137

Hussein, G. S., Zaied, A. N. H., & Mohamed, M. (2023). ADM: Appraiser Decision Model for Empowering Industry 5.0-Driven Manufacturers toward Sustainability and Optimization: A Case Study. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 11, 22-30 https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.90.

Jafari, N., Azarian, M., & Yu, H. (2022). Moving from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: what are the implications for smart logistics?. Logistics, 6(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020026

Palanikumar, M., Kausar, N., Ahmed, S. F., Edalatpanah, S. A., Ozbilge, E., & Bulut, A. (2023). New applications of various distance techniques to multi-criteria decision-making challenges for ranking vague sets. AIMS Mathematics, 8(5), 11397-11424. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023577

Rezaei, A., & Hemati, M. (2022). Providing a Hybrid Fuzzy Approach to Explain Managers’ Mental Paradigms to Prioritize Employee Needs. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2022.335662.1212

Okoli, C. and Schabram, K. (2015) ‘A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research’. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743

Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Mansory, A., Nasiri, A., & Mohammadi, N. (2021). Proposing an integrated model for evaluation of green and resilient suppliers by path analysis, SWARA and TOPSIS. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 8(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.22105 /jarie.2021.256316.1206

Rezapour, S., Farahani, R. Z., & Pourakbar, M. (2017). Resilient supply chain network design under competition: a case study. European journal of operational research, 259(3), 1017-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.041

Datta, P. (2017). Supply network resilience: a systematic literature review and future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1387-1424. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0064

Hohenstein, N. O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 45(1/2), 90-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128.

Ruiz-Benitez, R., López, C., & Real, J. C. (2017). Environmental benefits of lean, green and resilient supply chain management: The case of the aerospace sector. Journal of cleaner production, 167, 850-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.201

Keerasuntonpong, P., & Cordery, C. (2018). How might normative and mimetic pressures improve local government service performance reporting?. Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1169-1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12252

Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14, 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.

Mohamed, M., Sallam, K. M., & Mohamed, A. W. (2023). Transition Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Innovations of Industry 5.0 Technologies Toward Smart Supply Chain Partners. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.74

Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., & Kohl, H. (2018). Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 118, 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026.

Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International journal of production economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776

Chen, L., Zhao, X., Tang, O., Price, L., Zhang, S., & Zhu, W. (2017). Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 194, 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.04.005

Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of business logistics, 40(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12202

Mohamed, M., & Gamal, A. (2023). Toward sustainable emerging economics based on industry 5.0: leveraging neutrosophic theory in appraisal decision framework. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 1, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.3

Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017). Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply chain management: an international journal, 22(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2016-0197

Singh, N. P., & Singh, S. (2019). Building supply chain risk resilience: Role of big data analytics in supply chain disruption mitigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2318-2342. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0346

Zamani, E. D., Smyth, C., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and big data analytics for supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 327(2), 605-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04983-y

Wong, W. P., Tan, K. H., Govindan, K., Li, D., & Kumar, A. (2021). A conceptual framework for information-leakage-resilience. Annals of Operations Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04219-5

Belhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Zkik, K., Cherrafi, A., & Touriki, F. E. (2020). The integrated effect of Big Data Analytics, Lean Six Sigma and Green Manufacturing on the environmental performance of manufacturing companies: The case of North Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119903

Frederico, G. F. (2021). Towards a supply chain 4.0 on the post-COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and strategic discussion for more resilient supply chains. Rajagiri Management Journal, 15(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-08-2020-0047

Muniz, S.M. (2022). Deployment of Agriculture 4.0 with the Integration of IoT. Computational algorithms and numerical dimensions, 1(3), 122-125. https://doi.org/10.22105/cand.2022.161803.

Fakheri, S. (2022). A comprehensive review of big data applications. Big data and computing visions, 2(1), 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2022.325256.1041

Yang, W., Cai, L., Edalatpanah, S. A., & Smarandache, F. (2020). Triangular single valued neutrosophic data envelopment analysis: application to hospital performance measurement. Symmetry, 12(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040588

Yucesan, M., & Gul, M. (2021). Failure prioritization and control using the neutrosophic best and worst method. Granular Computing, 6, 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00206-1

Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Moustafa, N., Abdel-Monem, A., & El-Saber, N. (2021). A security-by-design decision-making model for risk management in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Access, 9, 107657-107679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098675

Adel, A. (2022). Future of industry 5.0 in society: Human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5

Qiu, P., Sorourkhah, A., Kausar, N., Cagin, T., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2023). Simplifying the Complexity in the Problem of Choosing the Best Private-Sector Partner. Systems, 11(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020080

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Ismail, M. M., Ahmed, Z., F. Abdel-Gawad, A., & Mohamed, M. (2024). Toward Supply Chain 5.0: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Sustainable and Resilience Enterprise . Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024955