Identifying Critical Factors for Implementing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Warehouse using a Newly Hybrid Decision-Making Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7120241240Keywords:
unmanned aerial vehicle, drone, factor, decision-making, warehouse, supply chainAbstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles have been broadly implemented and applied to the Supply Chain Management domain. However, its applicability in warehouse management is still in the early stages, and the influence of UAV adoption needs to be extensively explored. The successful implementation of this innovative technology depends on various influential factors that require systematic processes and techniques for a more precise investigation. This study aims to identify critical factors for implementing UAVs in warehouse management. The proposed method integrates the Delphi technique, best-worst method, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, and analytic network process to improve deficiencies of traditional and improved forms of multi-criteria decision-making. Two major factors, Operation and Technology, and ten sub-factors were identified. The method was applied to recognize the most critical factor of UAV adoption in warehouse management and provides a foundation for future research and practitioners to put deep concern on those factors.
Downloads
References
[1] Boynton, A. C., & Zmud, R. W. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan management review, 25(4), 17-27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282370599
[2] Chang, W.-L. (2020). Applying ANP to analyse sensory experience in restaurants. British Food Journal, 122(1), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0497
[3] Cheema, M. A., Ansari, R. I., Ashraf, N., Hassan, S. A., Qureshi, H. K., Bashir, A. K., & Politis, C. (2022). Blockchain-based secure delivery of medical supplies using drones. Computer Networks, 204, 108706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108706
[4] Chen, H., Hu, Z., & Solak, S. (2021). Improved delivery policies for future drone-based delivery systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(3), 1181-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.02.039
[5] Cho, H., Kim, D., Park, J., Roh, K., & Hwang, W. (2018). 2D barcode detection using images for drone-assisted inventory management. 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), 1538663341. https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2018.8441834
[6] Delaney, R., & D'Agostino, R. (2015). The challenges of integrating new technology into an organization. http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/mathcompcapstones/25
[7] Đukić, Đ. N., Petrović, I., Božanić, D., & Delibašić, B. (2022). Selection of Unployed Aircraft for Training of Small-Range Aircraft Defense System AHP–TOPSIS Optimization Methods. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 32(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR211125007D
[8] Fu, C.-H., Tsao, M.-W., Chi, L.-P., & Zhuang, Z.-Y. (2021). On the dominant factors of civilian-use drones: A thorough study and analysis of cross-group opinions using a triple helix model (THM) with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Drones, 5(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5020046
[9] Govindan, K., & Chaudhuri, A. (2016). Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 90, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.11.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.11.010
[10] Han, Y., Fang, D., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2020). Evaluation of attack capability of UAV intelligent swarm based on AHP fuzzy evaluation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742-6596. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1651/1/012012
[11] Jhunjhunwala, P., Shriya, M., & Rufus, E. (2019). Development of hardware based inventory management system using uav and rfid. 2019 International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking (ViTECoN), 1538693534. https://doi.org/10.1109/ViTECoN.2019.8899488
[12] Kamat, A., Shanker, S., & Barve, A. (2023). Assessing the factors affecting implementation of unmanned aerial vehicles in Indian humanitarian logistics: a g-DANP approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(2), 416-456. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2021-0037
[13] Khazetdinov, A., Aleksandrov, A., Zakiev, A., Magid, E., & Hsia, K. (2020). RFID-based warehouse management system prototyping using a heterogeneous team of robots. Robots in human life, 263, 2020.2024-2026.2008. https://doi.org/10.13180/clawar.2020.24-26.08.32
[14] Kiani, M., Bagheri, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Alimohammadlou, M. (2022). A model for prioritizing outsourceable activities in universities through an integrated fuzzy-MCDM method. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), 784-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1645264
[15] Kim, D. Y., & Kumar, V. (2009). A framework for prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in R&D. Journal of Intellectual capital, 10(2), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910952669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910952669
[16] Lee, P. T.-W., Wu, J.-Z., Hu, K.-C., & Flynn, M. (2013). Applying analytic network process (ANP) to rank critical success factors of waterfront redevelopment. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(4-5), 390-411. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2013.055276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2013.055276
[17] Liu, P. C., Lo, H.-W., & Liou, J. J. (2020). A combination of DEMATEL and BWM-based ANP methods for exploring the green building rating system in Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(8), 3216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083216
[18] Malang, C., Charoenkwan, P., & Wudhikarn, R. (2023). Implementation and critical factors of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in warehouse management: A systematic literature review. Drones, 7(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7020080
[19] Nassereddine, M., & Eskandari, H. (2017). An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 427-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.013
[20] Ochoa, K. S., & Guo, Z. (2019). A framework for the management of agricultural resources with automated aerial imagery detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.03.028
[21] Ozkan, O. (2023). Multi‐objective optimization of transporting blood products by routing UAVs: the case of Istanbul. International Transactions in Operational Research, 30(1), 302-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13109
[22] Pasini, R. (2023). Drones take the night shift for improved inventory tracking. Design World. https://www.designworldonline.com/drones-take-the-night-shift-for-improved-inventory-tracking/
[23] Raj, A., & Sah, B. (2019). Analyzing critical success factors for implementation of drones in the logistics sector using grey-DEMATEL based approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 138, 106118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106118
[24] Raskin, M. S. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
[25] Rave, A., Fontaine, P., & Kuhn, H. (2023). Drone location and vehicle fleet planning with trucks and aerial drones. European Journal of Operational Research, 308(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.10.015
[26] Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2000). Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy, politics, & nursing practice, 1(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440000100409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440000100409
[27] Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Simske, S. J., & Treiblmaier, H. (2023). Drones for supply chain management and logistics: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 26(6), 708-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1981273
[28] Ridolfi, M., Macoir, N., Vanhie-Van Gerwen, J., Rossey, J., Hoebeke, J., & De Poorter, E. (2019). Testbed for warehouse automation experiments using mobile AGVs and drones. IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 1728118786. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2019.8845218
[29] Saaty, T. L. (1984). The analytic hierarchy process: Decision making in complex environments. In Quantitative assessment in arms control: mathematical modeling and simulation in the analysis of arms control problems (pp. 285-308). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12
[30] Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process (Vol. 282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7
[31] Thakkar, J. J., & Thakkar, J. J. (2021). Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Multi-criteria decision making, 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_9
[32] Wu, W.-W., & Lee, Y.-T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
[33] Xu, L., Kamat, V. R., & Menassa, C. C. (2018). Automatic extraction of 1D barcodes from video scans for drone-assisted inventory management in warehousing applications. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1393505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1393505
[34] Zarei, L., Moradi, N., Peiravian, F., & Mehralian, G. (2020). An application of analytic network process model in supporting decision making to address pharmaceutical shortage. BMC health services research, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05477-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.